HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
O&M) PB. GOVT. THROUGH COLLECTOR FEROZEPUR – Appellant
Versus
VEDYA BAI – Respondent
RFA 2133/2007
RFA No. 2133 of 2007 (O&M) and other connected cases
-1-
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Regular First Appeal No. 2133 of 2007 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 13.2.2014.
State of Punjab and others
.......Appellants
Versus
Vidya Bai
........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present:
Mr. Piyush Bansal, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. C.M.Munjal, Advocate,
Mr. S.P.S.Tinna, Advocate and
Mr. B.S.Sidhu, Advocate
for the land owners/claimants.
****
SABINA, J.
Vide this judgment, following RFAs filed by the State as
well as claimants would be disposed of as they relate to same
acquisition.
Appeals filed by the claimants
1.
RFA No. 1028 of 2008
2.
RFA No. 1029 of 2008
3.
RFA No. 1030 of 2008
4.
RFA No. 2572 of 2007
5.
RFA No. 2573 of 2007
6.
RFA No. 2574 of 2007
7.
RFA No. 2575 of 2007
8.
RFA No. 2576 of 2007
9.
RFA No. 2577 of 2007
10.
RFA No. 2578 of 2007
Singh Gurpreet
2014.02.21 10:47
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
chandigarh
RFA No. 2133 of 2007 (O&M) and other connected cases
-2-
11.
RFA No. 2579 of 2007
12.
RFA No. 2141 of 2007
13.
RFA No. 2142 of 2007
14.
RFA No. 2143 of 2007
15.
RFA No. 2144 of 2007
16.
RFA No. 2145 of 2007
17.
RFA No. 2146 of 2007
18.
RFA No. 2147 of 2007
19.
RFA No. 2148 of 2007
20.
RFA No. 2681 of 2008
21.
RFA No. 2682 of 2008
Appeals filed by the State
1.
RFA No. 2426 of 2008
2.
RFA No. 2427 of 2008
3.
RFA No. 2428 of 2008
4.
RFA No. 2429 of 2008
5.
RFA No. 2430 of 2008
6.
RFA No. 4253 of 2007
7.
RFA No. 4254 of 2007
8.
RFA No. 4255 of 2007
9.
RFA No. 4256 of 2007
10.
RFA No. 4257 of 2007
11.
RFA No. 4258 of 2007
12.
RFA No. 4259 of 2007
13.
RFA No. 4260 of 2007
14.
RFA No. 4261 of 2007
Vide notification dated 3.10.1997 under Section 4 of the
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ('Act' for short), land was sought to be
acquired for construction of Bam drain into Aspal drain. The Land
Singh Gurpreet
2014.02.21 10:47
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
chandigarh
RFA No. 2133 of 2007 (O&M) and other connected cases
-3-
Acquisition Collector awarded compensation at the rate of
` 2,25,000/- per acre to the land owners.
Feeling dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by
the Land Acquisition Collector, the land owners sought references
under Section 18 of the Act.
On the pleadings of the parties, issues were framed by
the Additional District Judge.
The references sought by the land owners were disposed
of by the Reference Court vide four awards dated 30.1.2007,
28.2.2007 and 5.9.2007. The Reference Court had not enhanced
the market value of the land assessed by the Land Acquisition
Collector but had granted compensation on account of severance of
the acquired land. Hence, the present appeals by the State as well
as by the land owners.
Evidence is referred from RFA No. 2133 of 2007.
Learned State counsel has submitted that the amount of
compensation granted by the Land Acquisition Collector was liable
to be upheld. Moreover, the land owners were not entitled to
receive any compensation on account of severance of the acquired
land.
Learned counsel for the claimants, on the other hand,
have submitted that in fact, the land had been acquired for
construction of Bam drain and so far as village Dharangwala was
concerned, the Land Acquisition Collector had assessed the market
value of the acquired land at the rate of ` 2,80,000/- per acre. The
land owners of villages Arniwala, Gaddandob and Burj
Hanumangarh, in the present appeals, were also entitled to receive
compensation at the rate of ` 2,80,000/- per acre qua the acquired
land as had been awarded to the land owners of village
Singh Gurpreet
2014.02.21 10:47
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
chandigarh
RFA No. 2133 of 2007 (O&M) and other connected cases
-4-
Dharangwala.
Admittedly, vide notification dat