SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PUNJAB STATE EL.BD – Appellant
Versus
JEON SINGH AND ANR – Respondent


RFA No.108 of 2006

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.M. Nos.4206 and 4207-CII of 2013 in

X Obj No.8-CI of 2013 in

RFA No.108 of 2006

Date of Decision.29.04.2013

Punjab State Electricity Board through the Land Acquisition Collector

.....Appellant

Versus

Jeon Singh s/o Sh. Nagina Singh (since deceased) through LRs and

another

.......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Aman Chaudhary, Advocate

for the appellant.

Mr. Pritam Saini, Advocate

for the respondents-cross objectors.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment ? No

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ? No

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No

-.-

K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)

C.M. No.4206-CI of 2013

Application is allowed.

Exemption granted as sought for.

C.M. No.4207-CI of 2013

The application seeking for permission to file cross

objections on behalf of the legal representatives of deceased claimant is

allowed subject to all just exceptions and the legal representatives are

permitted to prosecute the cross objection.

X. Obj No.8-CI of 2013 and RFA No.108 of 2006

1.

Both the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top