HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MAM RAJ AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 15986 of 2013
Date of Decision : 27.11.2013
Mam Raj & others
.......... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana & others
...... Respondents
*****
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present :
Mr.Ramesh Hooda, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Ms. Palika Monga, DAG, Haryana.
****
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
SURYA KANT
, J. (Oral)
The petitioners impugn the notifications dated 11.09.2012 and
27.11.2012 issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
(hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') in respect of acquisition of their land
measuring 16 Kanal-4 Marlas situated in the revenue estate of village
Gurawar, District Jhajjar, which has been acquired to construct the Water
Works for a group of three villages under the Water Supply Scheme of
Jhajjar Town.
2.
The principal contention of the petitioners is that close to their
acquired land, there lies a huge chunk of Gram Panchayat land of village
Jondhi, who has passe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.