SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
M/S INDUSLND BANK LTD – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH AND ORS – Respondent


In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

F.A.O. No. 3447 of 2008 (O&M)

Date of decision: August 11, 2009

M/s Indusland Bank Limited

.. Appellant

Vs.

Ramesh and others

.. Respondents

F.A.O. No.3448 of 2008 (O&M)

M/s Indusland Bank Limited

.. Appellant

Vs.

Sharda and others

.. Respondents

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal

Present:

Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.

Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.4.

A.N. Jindal, J

This order of mine shall dispose of two connected F.A.O. Nos.

3447 and 3448 of 2008, having arisen out of the judgment dated 19.7.2008

passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rewari, whereby the

Tribunal has awarded compensation as under :-

MACT Case No.42 of 2006, titled as Ramesh & Pankaj vs. Jile Singh and

others decided on 19.7.2008

Compensation to the tune of Rs.2,97,000/- .

MACT Case No.53 of 2006, titled as Sharda vs. Jile Singh and others

decided on 19.7.2008

Compensation to the tune of Rs.37,000/-.

However, claimant in both the petitions were awarded interest

at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till

actual

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top