SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MUKESH SAYAL – Appellant
Versus
RAVI KHURANA – Respondent


CRR-457-2018

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRR-457-2018 (O&M)

Reserved on: 03.08.2022

Date of Pronouncement: 08.08.2022

Mukesh Sayal

...Petitioner (s)

Versus

Ravi Khurana

&Respondent(s)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Ms. Kanika Ahuja, Legal Aid Counsel

for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate

for the respondent.

****

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

On dishonor of cheque given by the respondent-Ravi Khurana to the

petitioner-Mukesh Sayal, the petitioner filed a complaint against the

respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for

short, the Act=).

Vide judgment dated 9.4.2014, learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class,

Ludhiana convicted and sentenced the accused-respondent.

Feeling aggrieved, the convict filed a criminal appeal before the Session

Court at Ludhiana and learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, vide

judgment dated 1.12.2017, set aside the judgment of conviction and

remanded the matter back to the trial Court and directed that the case

shall proceed from the stage of evidence

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top