HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PYARE LAL – Appellant
Versus
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER HARYANA & ORS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.3336 of 2010
Date of decision : 14.11.2011
Pyare Lal
… Petitioner
Versus
Financial Commissioner, Haryana and others.
…Respondents
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL,
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present:
Mr.Amit Jain, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana
for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr.Amandeep Hooda, Advocate for respondent no.5.
Paramjeet Singh, J.
The instant writ petition has been filed under Articles
226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of order dated
06.03.2006 (Annexure P/7) passed by the Commissioner, whereby
order dated 03.03.1999 (Annexure P/4) passed by the Assistant
Collector First Grade, Hansi, under Section 13-A of the Punjab
Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred
to as the Act) , as applicable in the State of Haryana, has been set
aside and the appeal of the respondent-Gram Panchayat has been
allowed declaring respondent – Gram Panchayat of Village
Sisiabola, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar, as owner of land measuring
32 kanals and also for quashing of order dated 29.05.2007
(Annexu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.