SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PREM AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HRY – Respondent


RFA No. 2918 of 2006

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

RFA No.2918 of 2006 (O&M)

Date of decision : 03.12.2015

Prem and others

... Appellants

vs

State of Haryana

.. Respondent

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal

Present:

Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate,

Mr. Munish Kumar Garg, Advocate,

Mr. Amit Kumar Jain,

Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate,

Mr. Suresh Ahlawat, Advocate,

Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for

Mr. S.N Pillania, Advocate,

Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate and

Mr. Sunil Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the landowners.

Mr. Abhinash Jain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.

Rajesh Bindal, J.

This order will dispose of a bunch of appeals bearing RFA

Nos.2918, 2920 of 2006, 3683 of 2007, 462 to 476, 519, 602 to 608, 811,

841 to 846, 926, 1207, 1505, 1506, 1866 to 1870, 1903 to 1905, 1945, 1948,

1950, 1966, 2001, 2070 to 2072, 2149, 2153, 2640 to 2643, 2797 to 2800,

2851, 2854, 4734, 4845, 5393, 6556, 6627 to 6630, 7209, 7241 of 2012,

688 to 691, 4309, 7192, 7193, 9136 and 10357 of 2014, as common

questions of law and facts are involved therein.

By filing the appeals, the landowners are only seeking

enhancement of damages on account of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top