HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PREM AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HRY – Respondent
RFA 2918/2006
RFA No. 2918 of 2006
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No.2918 of 2006 (O&M)
Date of decision : 03.12.2015
Prem and others
... Appellants
vs
State of Haryana
.. Respondent
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present:
Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate,
Mr. Munish Kumar Garg, Advocate,
Mr. Amit Kumar Jain,
Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate,
Mr. Suresh Ahlawat, Advocate,
Mr. Amit Kumar Jain, Advocate for
Mr. S.N Pillania, Advocate,
Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate and
Mr. Sunil Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the landowners.
Mr. Abhinash Jain, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajesh Bindal, J.
This order will dispose of a bunch of appeals bearing RFA
Nos.2918, 2920 of 2006, 3683 of 2007, 462 to 476, 519, 602 to 608, 811,
841 to 846, 926, 1207, 1505, 1506, 1866 to 1870, 1903 to 1905, 1945, 1948,
1950, 1966, 2001, 2070 to 2072, 2149, 2153, 2640 to 2643, 2797 to 2800,
2851, 2854, 4734, 4845, 5393, 6556, 6627 to 6630, 7209, 7241 of 2012,
688 to 691, 4309, 7192, 7193, 9136 and 10357 of 2014, as common
questions of law and facts are involved therein.
By filing the appeals, the landowners are only seeking
enhancement of damages on account of bifurcation of their land.
Briefly, the facts of the case are that State of Haryana vide
notification dated 30.8.2000 published on 31.8.2000, issued under Section 4
of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') sought to acquire
land measuring 161 kanals 2 marlas situated in villages Gatauli, Bura
Dehar, Kinana, Samlo Khurd, Anupgarh, Biroli, Radhana, Brah Khurd, Brah
Kalan, Kharak Ramji, Sewaha, Pillu Khera, Kalwa and Bhuran, Tehsil and
SHARMILA
2016.01.05 16:34
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document.
Chandigarh
RFA No. 2918 of 2006
(2)
District Jind for construction of Kalwa-Kinana Drain. The same was
followed by notification dated 12.1.2001 published on 15.1.2001, issued
under Section 6 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short, 'the
Collector'), vide his different awards, assessed the market value of the
acquired land as under:-
Name of
Village
Compensation for the acquired land in ` (per acre)
Nehri
Barani
Near National
Highway
Gair Mumkin
Gatauli
1,50,000/-
75,000/-
-
-
Bura Dehar
1,50,000/-
75,000/-
-
-
Kinana
1,80,000/-
-
3,00,000/-
-
Samlo Khurd
1,50,000/-
-
-
-
Anupgarh
1,50,000/-
-
-
-
Biroli
1,50,000/-
-
-
-
Radhana
1,70,000/-
-
2,50,000/-
3,00,000/-
Brah Khurd
1,50,000/-
-
2,00,000/-
-
Brah Kalan
1,50,000/-
-
-
3,00,000/-
Kharak Ramji
1,50,000/-
-
-
-
Sewaha
1,50,000/-
70,000/-
-
3,00,000/-
Pillu Khera
1,50,000/-
-
-
-
Kalwa
1,50,000/-
-
-
2,50,000/-
Bhuran
1,50,000/-
-
-
-
Aggrieved against the awards of the Collector, the landowners
filed objections which were referred to the learned court below, who
keeping in view the material placed on record by the parties, assessed the
market value of the acquired land as under:-
Name of
Village
Compensation for the acquired land in ` (per acre)
Nehri
Barani
Near National
Highway
Gair Mumkin
Gatauli
3,00,000/-
1,40,000/-
-
-
Bura Dehar
3,00,000/-
-
-
-
Kinana
-
-
-
-
Samlo Khurd
3,00,000/-
-
-
-
Anupgarh
3,00,000/-
-
-
-
Biroli
3,00,000/-
-
-
-
Radhana
4,00,000/-
-
5,00,000/-
-
Brah Khurd
-
-
-
-
Brah Kalan
3,00,000/-
-
-
-
SHARMILA
2016.01.05 16:34
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document.
Chandigarh
RFA No. 2918 of 2006
(3)
Name of
Village
Compensation for the acquired land in ` (per acre)
Kharak Ramji
3,00,000/-
-
-
-
Sewaha
3,00,000/-
1,40,000/-
-
5,00,000/-
Pillu Khera
-
-
-
-
Kalwa
3,00,000/-
-
-
2,50,000/-
Bhurain
-
-
-
-
These awards had been impugned before this Court. Earlier this
Court vide order dated 2.2.2011 passed in RFA No.2106 of 2006—State of
Haryana v. Banwari and others, remitted the cases back to the learned court
below for taking decision afresh. On remand, the learned court below vide
different awards, assessed the market value of the acquired land @ `
3,05,00