IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RFA.No.758 of 2007 (O&M)

DATE OF ORDER: 24.4.2007

Sukhdev Dass

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

Chuhar Ram etc

....Respondent(s)

CORUM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. AGGARWAL

.*.*.*.

Present:

Mr. B.P.S. Virk, Advocate.

M.M. AGGARWAL,J

This is an appeal against judgment dated 31.10.2003 passed by

Additional District Judge, Patiala.

There is delay of about three years in filing the appeal. Suit

was under Section 92 CPC. Vide impugned judgment, a scheme had been

made by the Court for providing management and utilisation of the funds of

Thakur Dawara.

On behalf of the appellant, it is stated that Arjan Dass, father of

the present appellant had died during the pendency of the suit and then

appellant had instructed the counsel to inform about the outcome of the suit

but counsel of the trial Court did not inform and therefore there had been

delay. It is pointed out that that suit was of the year 1991.

I have gone through the judgment. Suit related to the property

owned by Thakur Dawara. Suit was under Section 92 CPC for appointment

of regular manager of Religious institutions Thakur Dawara Dehdna Tehsil

Samana, District Patiala.

After the death of Arjan Dass, Sukhdev Dass had become LR

and had contested the suit. Vide detailed judgment, Additional District

Judge, Patiala had appointed a committee for management of the properties

and had even appointed chartered Accountant for the purpose of managing

RFA.No.758 of 2007 (O&M)

#2#

the accounts etc.

When this appeal has been filed after a delay of about three

years, I do not find any good ground to condone the delay or even issue

notice.

As such, appeal is dismissed.

April 24, 2007

( M.M. AGGARWAL )

manoj

JUDGE