C.M. Nos.4834-C of 2007, 3679 & 3680 OF 2008 &

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1631 OF 2007& :{ 1 }:

XOBJECTION NO.9-C OF 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY 22, 2010

State Bank of India and others

.....Appellants

VERSUS

Ram Singh

....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

PRESENT:

Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Advocate,

for the appellant.

Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate,

for the X-Objector/respondent.

****

RANJIT SINGH, J.

The appellant-Bank has filed this appeal against the

judgment of the first Appellate Court, which has reversed the

judgment passed by the Trial Court, dismissing the suit filed by the

respondent employee. The appellant-Bank with vast resources at its

command would not hesitate to contest any claim whether justified

or not. Appellant-Bank would plead that following substantial

question of law would emerge in this case:-

C.M. Nos.4834-C of 2007, 3679 & 3680