SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
,
BIMLA DEVI AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-17182-2021 (O&M)

Date of Decision:26.11.2021

Bimla Devi and others

... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana & others

... Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ.

Present:-

Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for HSVP.

...

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, J. (ORAL).

Petitioners herein are members of Residents Welfare

Association Sectors 6, 7, 8, Urban Estate Jind.

The short prayer raised in the instant petition is for issuance of a

mandamus directing the respondents/HSVP to re-calculate the element of

enhanced compensation cost in view of the revised Policy dated 22.08.2019

and based thereupon raise a fresh demand and which the petitioners are

ready and willing to pay.

Learned counsel representing the petitioners invited our

attention to an order dated 25.02.2020 passed by a Coordinate Bench while

disposing of CWP-3960-2018 and which reads in the following terms:

“Petitioners have posed a challenge to the demand notice

whereby additional price is sought by the HUDA on account of

enhancement in the compensation for develop

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top