SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
VISHNU DUTT SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
HARYANA STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION, PANCHKULA AND ANR – Respondent


CWP No.18997 of 2019

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No.18997 of 2019

Date of decision:16.07.2019

Vishnu Dutt Sharma

... Petitioner

Vs.

Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula and another

... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:-

Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate

for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL J.

Petitioner has sought indulgence of this Court under Article

226 of Constitution of India for directing the respondents to scrutinize the

documents & to interview for the post of PGT History (Rest of Haryana)

Secondary Education Department, Haryana.

Mr. Mani Ram Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of

petitioner submitted that Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula

caused advertisement no.4 of 2015 inviting applications for filling up 398

posts of PGT History. The petitioner being eligible applied for the said post

in General Category and was allotted roll number 13080391. The written

examination was held on 13.03.2016. On the basis of result, candidates were

called for scrutiny of the documents but petitioner was not aware of date

fixed for scrutiny from 16.01.2017 to 18.01.2017. The candidates whose

documen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top