SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
H S E B – Appellant
Versus
LAL CHAND AND ORS – Respondent


LPA No. 299 of 2008

:1:

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh.

LPA No. 299 of 2008

Date of Decision: 15.04.2009

Haryana State Electricty Board

....Appellant.

Versus

Lal Chand

....Respondent.

Coram:- Hon'ble Mr.Justice J.S. Khehar

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uma Nath Singh

Present: Mr. B.S. Rana, Advocate

for the appellant.

...

J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral).

Respondent – Lal Chand approached this Court by filing Civil

Writ Petition No.1174 of 1988. Through the aforesaid writ petition, he

impugned the revised seniority list dated 17.3.1987 (Annexure P-3). Based

on the aforesaid challenge, respondent – Lal Chand also claimed

consequential benefits. It is not a matter of dispute, that in so far as the

issue of seniority is concerned, the challenge was as against respondents

No.3 to 8. Some of the aforestated respondents had been allowed promotion

to the next higher post of Deputy Superintendent with effect from 2.3.1988.

During the pendency of Civil Writ Petition No.1174 of 1988, the appellant

i.e. Haryana State Electricity Board unilaterally accepted the claim of

respondent – Lal Chand a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top