SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
BHUPESH AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CWP No.18025 of 2015

Date of decision: 03.10.2019

Bhupesh and others

..Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

..Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL

Present:

Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. AG, Haryana

for respondent No.1-State.

Mr. Abhay Gupta, Advocate for

Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate

for respondents No.2 and 3.

***

Daya Chaudhary, J.

The petitioners are aggrieved by the action of respondent-

authorities, whereby, they have been held liable to pay simple interest @

15% per annum and penal interest @ 4% per annum to be calculated from

the date of allotment till the date of depositing the same and also to pay

extension fee.

The petitioners have also prayed for waiving off interest as

basic amenities/facilities were not provided and interest cannot be imposed

upon them.

Briefly, the facts of the case as made out in the present petition

are that the petitioners were allotted plots in the year 2002. There were

certain terms and conditions as mentioned in the allotment letters. As per

NEETU RANI

2019.10.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top