SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD – Appellant
Versus
PERMANENT LOK ADALAT (PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES&ANR – Respondent


C.W.P. No. 9949 of 2010

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

C.W.P. No. 9949 of 2010

Date of Decision : 13.01.2012

Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.

........Petitioner

Versus

Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services),

Gurgaon and another

........Respondents

******

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH

-.-

1. Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present: Mr. Vikas Suri, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Baldev Singh Dhillon, Advocate,

for respondent No.2.

***

Alok Singh, J. (Oral)

Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services), Gurgaon, vide award

dated 06.10.2009 has decided the dispute between the parties on merit by

invoking sub-section (8) of Section 22C of the Legal Services Authorities Act,

1987 (in short 'the Act') without following the procedure provided under

sub-sections (4),(5),(6) of Sect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top