IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Sr.No.227

CR No.2410 of 2020

Date of Decision: 06.01.2023

M/s Siddarth Woolen Mills

...Petitioner

Versus

Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd through

its XEN and another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

Present:

Mr. Abhinav Sood, Advocate for

Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. S.K. Mahajan, Advocate

for the respondent-Nigam.

* * * *

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.

(ORAL)

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission

to withdraw the present revision petition.

Learned counsel for the respondent-Nigam has no objection

for the same.

Resultantly, the revision petition in hand stands dismissed for

having been withdrawn.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA)

06.01.2023

JUDGE

neetu

Whether speaking/reasoned

Yes

Whether Reportable

No

NEETU RANI

2023.01.06 17:24

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this order/judgment

PHHC, CHD