SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ASHOK KUMAR AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

LPA No. 881 of 2009 (O&M)

Date of decision: 11.9.2009.

Ashok Kumar and others

......Appellants

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM:-

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

PRESENT:

Mr.K.L.Dhingra, Advocate for the appellants.

****

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. (Oral)

1.

The appellants were recruited on ad hoc basis and had worked

for 14 years on the posts of Cook/Sweeper. Their services were terminated

vide order dated 19.8.2009.

2.

Learned Single Judge held that in view of judgment of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Secretary State of Karnataka and others v.

Uma Devi (3) and others 2006(4) SCC 1, no direction could be issued for

regularization or for allowing the appellants to continue till regular selection

made. It was further observed that appellants could apply in pursuance of

advertisement which had been issued and the respondents would consider

their claim on the basis of appellants having already worked for

considerable period.

3.

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in later

judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in UP State Electricity Board

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top