SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
OM PARKASH AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
LALA DEVI DAYAL BHOO SEWA TRUST AND ANR – Respondent


RSA No.1953 of 2008

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CM No.5826-C of 2008 &

RSA No.1953 of 2008

Decided on : 19.01.2010

Om Parkash & another

... Appellants

versus

Lala Devi Dayal Bhoo Sewa Trust

& another

... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

Present :

Mr. Sachin Mittal, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. Kulwant Singh, Advocate

for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate

for respondents.

****

1.Whether Reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see

the judgment?

2.To be referred to the reporters or not?

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)

CM No.5826-C of 2008

For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of

6 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

CM stands disposed of.

RSA No.1953 of 2008

This appeal has been filed against the concurrent

judgments of the Courts below dismissing the suit of the

appellant for preemption of the sale deed in favour of respondent

No.1.

Learned counsel for the appellants has very fairly

RSA No.1953 of 2008

-2-

stated that originally the entire land had been leased out in the

year 1964 to five persons i.e. 1/4th share to Mulakh R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top