-1-

F.A.O. No.397 of 2010.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

...

Date of Decision: February 02, 2011.

F.A.O. No.397 of 2010.

Krishan

.......Appellant

Versus

Anita alias Neeta

........Respondent

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHINDER PAL.

1.

Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see

the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?

Present:

Mr. Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Advocate,

for the appellant.

Mr. Harish Nain, Advocate,

for the respondent.

-.-

MOHINDER PAL, J.

The appellant has preferred this appeal against the

judgment dated 28.8.2009 passed by the learned Guardian

Judge (Exercising the Powers of District Judge), Jind, whereby the

petition filed by appellant Krishan under Section 25 of the

-2-

F.A.O. No.397 of 2010.

Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 read with Section 6 of Hindu

Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, for custody of the minor girl

child Pooja, who was born on 20.8.2000 out of the wedlock

between the appellant and respondent, was dismissed