HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ROSHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
CWP 19966/2021
264
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CWP-19966-2021
Date of decision: 12.05.2022
ROSHAN LAL
...Petitioner
versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
&Respondents
CORAM: HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present:- Mr. Rajat Mor, Advocate,
For the petitioner.
Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Additional A.G., Haryana.
*****
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks issuance of a writ in the nature
of mandamus directing the respondents to grant him total 10 marks under
socio economic per criteria in advertisement No.5/2019 (Annexure P-1) and
recommend his name for appointment to the post of Clerk.
Learned counsel for the petitioner also relies on an order dated
05.10.2021 passed by this Court in CWP-10860-2020 titled 8Sumit Versus
Haryana Staff Sélection Commission9.
Learned State counsel, at the outset, points out that the result for
the post of Clerk advertised vide advertisement No.5/2019, (Annexure P-1)
impugned herein, has been quashed vide order dated 25.04.2022 passed in
CWP No.15672-2021 titled as <Amit Kumar and others Vs. State of
Haryana and others= wherein it has been directed that the Commission shall
carry out re-evaluation of all the candidates across board who had
participated in the selection process and declare their result and prepare fresh
merit list after carrying out re-evaluation.
VANDANA
2022.05.13 10:17
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
In view of the aforesaid, instant writ petition is disposed of in
terms of CWP No.15672-2021 ibid. While considering the case of the
petitioner afresh, order/Judgement dated 05.10.2021 ibid passed in CWP-
10860-2020 be also gone through and if applicable, benefit of the same be
given to the petitioner.
(ARUN MONGA)
JUDGE
May 12, 2022
vandana
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No
VANDANA
2022.05.13 10:17
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document