HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
M/S PIONEER PARTNERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
CWP 20303/2021
102
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
.....
CWP No.20303 of 2021
.....
Date of Decision:09.11.2021
M/s Pioneer Partners
....Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
.....
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Karamjit Singh
.....
(Heard through Video-Conferencing)
.....
Present:
Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vibhav Jain and Mr.
Vikram Singh Brar, Advocates for the petitioner.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Senior Additional Advocate General,
Haryana for respondents No.1 to 4.
Mr. Sanjay Kaushal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ishaan
Bhardwaj, Advocate for the Caveator/respondent-The Warrier
Mining Minerals and Infra Pvt. Ltd.
.....
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.
The background facts:
The Department of Mines and Geology, State of Haryana issued
an E-auction Notice dt. 22.01.2016 inviting bids for mining leases for
extraction of minor minerals “Stone along with Associated minor minerals”
from the mines of the Districts of Mahendergarh and Bhiwani and “Slate
Stone mine” of District Rewari.
The petitioner, which is a partnership firm constituted under the
Partnership Deed dt. 12.02.2016 having four partners submitted its bid for
HARPAL SINGH PARMAR
2021.11.15 14:25
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP No.20303 of 2021
[2]
obtaining mining lease of Minor Mineral Mine, namely, “Pichopa Kalan Plot
No.2” for extraction of “Stone along with Associated minor minerals” having
tentative area of 22.40 hectares by quoting a bid amount of `16,46,50,000/-
per annum against the reserve price of `14,75,00,000/- per annum. E-auction
was held on 16/17.03.2016.
The Director General of Mines and Geology Department, State of
Haryana (3rd respondent) informed the petitioner that its bid was the highest
bid in respect of the said mine vide Letter of Intent dt. 11.04.2016.
Thereafter, there was a change in the constitution of petitioner-
firm and two partners were inducted into it under Partnership Deed dt.
16.05.2016.
The petitioner then submitted the draft ML-1 Form along with all
relevant documents for the perusal of the Mining Officer, Bhiwani, Haryana
(4th respondent) and also submitted the new Partnership Deed dt. 16.05.2016
containing the names of the six partners along with a letter of authority in
favour of Mr. Deepak Agarwal, one of the partners, for execution of the lease
deed on behalf of the petitioner-firm.
The 3rd respondent then informed the petitioner on 02.09.2016
that 4th respondent vide memo dt. 22.07.2016 had sent the draft lease deed
agreement papers (draft ML-1 Form) submitted by the petitioner to a
Chartered Accountant for scrutiny/examination, and upon scrutiny, certain
discrepancies were noticed. The petitioner was further asked to complete the
short-comings/submit the additional documents/clarification/amended
affidavits etc. as per the observations of the Chartered Accountant within a
HARPAL SINGH PARMAR
2021.11.15 14:25
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CWP No.20303 of 2021
[3]
week so that further action could be taken. The petitioner was also to submit
the copy of the old Partnership-Deed.
The petitioner then submitted all the documents sought through a
letter on 15.09.2016 annexing both the Partnership-Deeds i.e. earlier
Partnership Deed dt. 04.03.2015 and the Partnership Deed dt. 12.02.2016 (old
Partnership-Deed).
After considering this material, the 3rd respondent executed Lease
Agreement on 09.11.2016 with the petitioner for a period of ten years in
respect of the said mine.
On 23.05.2017, the petitioner applied for and was granted
requisite environment clearance for the said mining project by the State
Environment Impact Assessment Authority, Haryana.
The petitioner also applied for and was granted Consent to
Establish as well as Consent to Operate the said mining project by the Haryana
State Pollution Control Board on 02.