SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GNERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD – Appellant
Versus
KANCHAN AND ORS – Respondent


FAO No.172 of 2012

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

X Obj No.17-CII of 2012 in

FAO No.172 of 2012

Date of Decision.18.03.2013

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited, SCO No.329, First

Floor, Sector 9, Panchkula through its Senior Executive Legal Sh. Sachin

Ohri

....Appellant

Versus

Kanchan widow of Suresh Sethi and others

.......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Nitin Mittal, Advocate for

Mr. Subhash Goyal, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. Ashwani Arora, Advocate

for respondent Nos.1 and 2-cross objectors.

2.

FAO No.5994 of 2010

Kusum Rani aged 35 years wife of late Balbir Singh and others

....Appellants

Versus

Rakesh Kumar son of Des Raj and another

.......Respondents

Present:

Mr. K.S. Banyana, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. R.C. Kapoor, Advocate

for respondent No.2.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment ? Yes

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ? Yes

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes

-.-

K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)

1.

The appeal in FAO No.172 of 2012 is at the instance of the

insurance company challenging the award

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top