HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AMANDEEP KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS – Respondent
CWP 5019/2014
CWP No.5019 of 2014 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.5019 of 2014 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 10.08.2015
Amandeep Kaur
.... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Present:
Mr. S.L. Chander Shekhar, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.
1.
The petitioner has approached this court claiming a direction to the
respondents to provide her compassionate appointment in any of the
Departments of the Government of Punjab including her late father's parent
department. Her father had served as a constable in the Punjab Police and
died of illness in the year 1986 when she was two years of age. The
petitioner attained the age of majority in 2003 when her mother made an
application to the Head of the Police Department that her daughter's case be
considered for ex-gratia employment in terms of the then existing scheme.
That request made on November 21, 2002 was considered and vide an
order passed by the Director General of Police, Punjab addressed to the
Additional Director General of Police, P.A.P., Jalandhar Cantt. with the
copy endorsed to the petitioner her case was rejected. It is not the case
either before the Government or in the present petition that the petitioner
MANJU
2015.08.11 14:21
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
High Court Chandigarh
CWP No.5019 of 2014 (O&M)
-2-
was not communicated the order adverse to her interest. There is a printing
error in the petition which the counsel is not able to reconcile as the date
of the order rejecting the case of the petitioner has been appended as
Annexure P-3 with the date December 24, 2003 but the index records the
date December 22, 2007. The difference is hardly of any significance in the
determination of the case.
2.
The present petition has been filed in 2014 on the strength of a policy
circular dated July 03, 2008 which provides as follows:-
“I am directed to refer to the Punjab Government letters
issued vide No.11/105/98-4PPII/14420, dated 21.11.2002 and
No.11/99/2002-4PP2/18086 dated 28.12.2005 on the subject
cited above and to inform that the State Government decided to
add following proviso below para 13 (a) of these policy
instructions:-
“Provided that in the case where the deceased
Government employee leaves behind his/her minor
children, who are studying at the time of death of the
employee and are not qualified for an employment in the
government and the spouse is not in a position to join the
Government job, a dependent child may be allowed to
apply for compassionate appointment by the competent
authority within a period of one year from the date of
attaining the age and educational qualifications for a
Group 'C' or 'D' appointment in government.”
2.
On humanitarian considerations, it has been decided as a
special one time measure to extend this benefit to all old
deserving cases in such cases, an application for employment may
be made within six months from the date of issue of these
instructions, if not already made. The Administrative Department
should complete the process of giving employment within a period
of nine moths from the date of issuance of these instructions. No
further relaxation shall be allowed under any circumstances.
3.
This change in the policy instructions may kindly be
brought to the notice of all concerned for meticulous
MANJU
2015.08.11 14:21
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
High Court Chandigarh
CWP No.5019 of 2014 (O&M)
-3-
compliance.”
3.
This circular appears to revive rights of minor children who were
studying at the time of death of the employee and were not qualified for
employment but gained the conditions precedent with the passage of time.
In such cases, a depende