REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2182 OF 2009 (O&M) :{ 1 }:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

DATE OF DECISION: FEBRUARY 01, 2010

Ram Karan

.....Appellant

VERSUS

Haryana State and others

....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

PRESENT:

Ms. Preeti Khanna, Advocate,

for the appellant.

Mr. Deepak Jindal, DAG, Haryana,

for the State.

****

RANJIT SINGH, J.

Following adverse remarks were recorded in the report of

Ram Karan for the period from 4.8.2005 to 22.2.2006:-

“1. Integrity: Dishonest

2. Reliability: Unreliable

3. General Remarks: There were complaints of his nexus

with Satta/gambling criminals while posted in

P.S.Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon.”

He accordingly filed a suit to challenge the said adverse

remarks on the ground that these were illegal and unlawful. He also

challenged the order whereby his representation against the adverse

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2182 OF 2009 (O&M) :{ 2 }:

remarks