SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ROOPA AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


CRWP-9611-2021

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

111

CRWP-9611-2021

Date of Decision: 08.10.2021

Roopa and another

...... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

......... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH

Present :

Ms. Harpreet Kaur , Advocate,

for the petitioners.

*****

AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. (ORAL)

By this petition, filed under the provisions of Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, the petitioners seek issuance of a direction to

respondents no.2 and 3, to protect their life and liberty, at the hands of

respondents no.4 to 6, with a further prayer made for a direction to

respondent no.2 to consider and decide the representation, dated 05.10.2021,

made by petitioner no.1.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per her

instructions neither of the petitioners is married nor are they in any

prohibited sapinda relationship to each other.

However upon query to her, as to why they are not getting

married to each other rather than living in a live-in relationship (though

obviously if they both are adults there may be no legal bar to that), she

expresses her ig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top