HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ROOPA AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
CRWP-9611-2021
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
111
CRWP-9611-2021
Date of Decision: 08.10.2021
Roopa and another
...... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
......... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present :
Ms. Harpreet Kaur , Advocate,
for the petitioners.
*****
AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. (ORAL)
By this petition, filed under the provisions of Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, the petitioners seek issuance of a direction to
respondents no.2 and 3, to protect their life and liberty, at the hands of
respondents no.4 to 6, with a further prayer made for a direction to
respondent no.2 to consider and decide the representation, dated 05.10.2021,
made by petitioner no.1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per her
instructions neither of the petitioners is married nor are they in any
prohibited sapinda relationship to each other.
However upon query to her, as to why they are not getting
married to each other rather than living in a live-in relationship (though
obviously if they both are adults there may be no legal bar to that), she
expresses her ig
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.