SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATINDER SINGH AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


CWP No.3275 of 2016

#1#

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No.3275 of 2016

Satinder Singh and Ors.

....Petitioner

Versus

F.C Revenue, Haryana and Ors.

....Respondents

Date of Order: 02.11.2017

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN

Present:

Mr. Arun Nehra, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Karan Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 & 5.

Mr. C.B. Goel, Advocate for respondent No.7.

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J (ORAL)

The respondent No.7 filed an application under Section 111 of

the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 (for short “the Act”) for seeking

partition of the joint khewat. The mode of partition was proposed on

08.7.2010 to which objection was filed by the petitioners on 19.8.2010. The

case was thereafter adjourned to 09.9.2010 on which date, the following

order was passed by the A.C, Second Grade, Fatehpur Pundri, District

Kaithal, which after translation reads as under:

“File is presented. Counsel for the applicants and

respondents along with their counsel are present.

Arguments on the mode of partition were heard. After

hearing the arguments, it was decided to inspect the

spot on 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top