SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SURJA – Appellant
Versus
SUBH RAM – Respondent


RSA No.2745 of 2009(O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

RSA No.2745 of 2009(O&M)

Date of Order: 26.03.2019

Surja

..Appellant

Versus

Subh Ram (since deceased) through his LRs

..Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

Present:

Mr. R.A.Sheoran, Advocate

for the appellant.

Mr. Kuldeep Khandelwal, Advocate

for the respondent(s).

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral)

Defendant-appellant is in the regular second appeal against the

concurrent findings of fact arrived at by both the courts below decreeing a

suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendant to interfere in his

peaceful possession.

At the time of admission, following substantial question of law

was framed:-

Whether the unregistered exchange deed (Ex.P-7) could

be read in evidence?”

Plaintiff claimed that his predecessor had received in exchange

a plot in question in lieu of 2 bighas land handed over to late Sh. Addu son

of Mukh Ram situated in village Khera Tharu.

Defendant on the other hand, claimed that he had purchased the

property from Smt. Naginee Devi widow of Bhagat Ram @ Ram Bhagat

NARESH KUMAR

2019.04.02 12:16

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top