SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
M/S PML INDUSTRIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND ANR – Respondent


CWP No.877 of 2013 & other connected matters 1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARAYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP No. 877 of 2013

Date of Decision: 26.02.2013

M/s PML Industries Limited

….Petitioner

Versus

Commissioner of Central Excise & another

….Respondents

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Kamal Sehgal, Advocate, for the respondents.

HEMANT GUPTA, J.

1.

This order shall dispose of the afore-mentioned writ petition

along with other writ petitions mentioned in the foot note of this order in

respect of the provisions of Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944

(for short ‘the Act’), whereby an order of waiver of pre-deposit of duty

passed by the Tribunal stands vacated after expiry of 180 days, if the appeal

is not decided in terms of the provisions inserted by Section 140 of the

Finance Act, 2002

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top