SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ARUN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS – Respondent


LPA No. 38 of 2011

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH.

LPA No. 38 of 2011

Date of decision 15 .3.2011

Arun Kumar

... Appellant

Versus

State of Haryana and others

... Respondents.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.S. MANN

Present:

Mr.V.B.Aggarwal,Advocate for the appellant

1. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

2. Whether the judgement should be reported in the Digest ?

M.M.KUMAR, J.

The instant appeal filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent is

directed against the judgement dated 1.7.2010 of the learned Single Judged

holding that the appellant would be engaged as Auctioneer as and when

required for auction to be conducted by the respondent- Committee.

2.

It is not disputed that the appellant was engaged as Auctioneer on

commission basis at Market Committee Shahbad on 25.4.1984 (R.2). His

rate of commission was 8 paise per Rs. 100/- of the value. The learned

Single Judge has found that the Auctioneer is appointed on commission

basis and not on regular basis. He is to earn commission at a specified rate.

3.

Mr. V.B.Aggarwal, learned counsel for the appellant, has

argued that Section 43(2)(viii) of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top