SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SHUNTY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
AMIT KUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

123

CRR No. 1403 of 2021(O&M)

Reserved on 10.11.2021

Pronounced on 17.11.2021

Shunty

......Petitioner

Vs.

Amit Kumar

......Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Nitin Meel, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pransh Dhull, Advocate for the complainant.

***

ANOOP CHITKARA J.

Criminal

Complaint

No.159-RT/2015 of 03.09.2014, under Section 138 of the Negotiable

Instruments Act, Tehsil Rajpura, District Patiala

Criminal

Appeal

CRA/0000278/2017, Additional Sessions Judge, District Patiala

Criminal

Revision

CRR No.1403 of 2021

1.

The petitioner, who stands convicted for the commission of offence punishable

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, (for short “NIA”) has

come up before this Court under Section 482, Code of Criminal Procedure, (CrPC)

for quashing the proceedings because the parties have compromised the matter.

2.

The petitioner faced crimin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top