HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
UMED SINGH TH LRS RAJENDERI AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
HAMID AND ORS – Respondent
FAO 189 2016
CM-464-CII-2021 in/and
1
FAO-189-2016 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CM-464-CII-2021 in/and
FAO-189-2016 (O&M)
Date of Decision: January 21, 2021
UMED SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS RAJENDERI @
JANTA AND ANOTHER
...... APPELLANT(s)
Versus
HAMID AND OTHERS
..... RESPONDENT(s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL
Present:
Mr. Rajbir Singh, Advocate
for applicant-respondent no.3-insurance company.
Mr. Yash Dev Kaushik, Advocate
for the non-applicant/appellants.
***
LISA GILL, J.
This matter is being taken up for hearing through video
conferencing due to the outbreak of pandemic, COVID-19.
Prayer in CM-464-CII-2021 is for listing of the appeal and its
disposal in terms of the compromise arrived at between the appellants and
respondent no.3-insurance company. It is submitted that the matter has been
amicably resolved between the parties.
Learned counsel for the appellants as well as insurance
company verify the factum of settlement between the parties.
Keeping in view the specific stand of the parties and at their
joint request, main appeal, which was admitted on 11.10.2018, is taken on
Board for hearing, today itself.
OMKAR SINGH
2021.01.22 17:51
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CM-464-CII-2021 in/and
2
FAO-189-2016 (O&M)
For the reasons mentioned in the application (CM-379-CII-2016),
supported by an affidavit of the applicant, same is allowed as prayed for. Delay
of 29 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. Application is accordingly
disposed of.
This appeal has been filed by legal heirs of claimant – Umed
Singh (since deceased), seeking enhancement of compensation awarded to
the claimant by learned MACT, Faridabad vide award dated 28.07.2015, on
account of injuries received by claimant in a motor vehicle accident. A sum
of Rs.1,14,150/- has been awarded to the legal heirs of the claimant by the
learned Tribunal.
It is submitted that during pendency of this appeal, matter has
been amicably resolved by way of an oral settlement. It is agreed between
the appellants and insurance company that a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- over and
above the amount awarded by learned MACT, Faridabad vide impugned
award dated 28.07.2015, would be paid to both the appellants i.e. legal heirs
of claimant – Umed Singh, in equal share by way of account payee cheques.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has specific
instructions from the appellants to accept counter offer of the proposal of
settlement. The appellants have agreed to accept a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- over
and above the amount awarded by the learned MACT, Faridabad on account
of injuries received by the clamant – Umed Singh (since deceased) in the
accident in question as full and final settlement of their claim.
Learned counsel for the insurance company submits that
amount of Rs.1,50,000/- shall be paid to the appellants through two account
payee cheques of Rs.75,000/- each, within one week. Photocopy of the letter
OMKAR SINGH
2021.01.22 17:51
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
CM-464-CII-2021 in/and
3
FAO-189-2016 (O&M)
(Annexure A-1) regarding settlement of claim from Mr. Yash Dev Kaushik,
Advocate, counsel for the appellants is annexed along with the application.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above,
application is allowed and this appeal is disposed of in terms of settlement
arrived at between the parties.
Needless to say, appellants are at liberty to move appropriate
application in this appeal, in case the cheques are not received/encashed. A
copy of this order be conveyed to the appellants at the address available on
the file.
21.01.2021
(LISA GILL)