SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
DHEERAJ TANGRI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


CRWP No.8144 of 2023

1

2023:PHHC:107824

113

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRWP-8144-2023

Date of Decision: 21.08.2023

Dheeraj Tangri and another

...Peoners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

…Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Gagandeep Singh Virk, Advocate for the peoners.

Mr. Shiva Khurmi, AAG, Punjab.

****

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

The present peon has been filed under Arcle 226/227 of the Constuon of

India for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus by direcng respondents No. 2

and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the peoners at the hands of respondent No. 4.

2.

Counsel for the peoners submits that he does not press the protecon at this

stage. However, he further submits that he would be sasfied in case direcons may be

issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the representaon (Annexure P-1) in a me bound

manner.

3.

Noces are served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel.

Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of

official respondents nor the issuance of noces to the private respondents is required.

4.

Let t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top