SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SURINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PRITAM SINGH AND ORS. – Respondent


RSA-3025-2010 (O&M)

1

206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

RSA-3025-2010 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 21.12.2015

SURINDER SINGH

......Appellant

Vs.

PRITAM SINGH AND ORS.

....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. S.S. Rangi, Advocate

for the appellant.

Mr. S.S. Majithia, Advocate

for the respondents.

****

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

*****

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J.

1)

Defendant is in second appeal against judgment and

decree dated 20.1.2010 passed by Additional District Judge, FTC,

Ludhiana, whereby appeal filed by the plaintiff against judgment

and decree dated 25.1.2008 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior

Division), Ludhiana has been accepted and defendant has been

given two months’ time to shift the workshop in dispute from the

residential locality.

2)

Plaintiffs filed suit for permanent injunction against the

defendant restraining him from changing the nature of the

SWARNJIT SINGH

2016.01.21 11:45

I at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top