HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SURINDER KANSAL AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
RAKESH RANI AND OTHERS – Respondent
132
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CR-3985-2022 (O&M)
Date of Decision: September 19, 2022
Surinder Kansal and another
...Petitioners
VERSUS
Rakesh Rani and others
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:
Mr.Arpandeep Narula, Advocate
for the petitioners.
****
ARCHANA PURI, J.
Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated
13.06.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.).
It is now submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that
the petitioners had filed a suit for declaration, thereby, asserting petitioner-
plaintiff No.1 to be owner in possession of the properties, as detailed in the
headnote of the plaint and also issuance of permanent injunction to restrain
the respondents/defendants, from interfering in their possession. Besides,
the same, even mandatory injunction, thereby, directing defendants No.1
and 2 to execute formal sale deeds of the property in dispute, in favour of
the plaintiffs, had been sought.
The copy of the plaint has been placed on record as Annexure
P-2. Annexure P-3 is the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with
151 CPC, filed along with the plaint. Ther
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.