SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SURINDER KANSAL AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
RAKESH RANI AND OTHERS – Respondent


132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CR-3985-2022 (O&M)

Date of Decision: September 19, 2022

Surinder Kansal and another

...Petitioners

VERSUS

Rakesh Rani and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI

Present:

Mr.Arpandeep Narula, Advocate

for the petitioners.

****

ARCHANA PURI, J.

Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated

13.06.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.).

It is now submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that

the petitioners had filed a suit for declaration, thereby, asserting petitioner-

plaintiff No.1 to be owner in possession of the properties, as detailed in the

headnote of the plaint and also issuance of permanent injunction to restrain

the respondents/defendants, from interfering in their possession. Besides,

the same, even mandatory injunction, thereby, directing defendants No.1

and 2 to execute formal sale deeds of the property in dispute, in favour of

the plaintiffs, had been sought.

The copy of the plaint has been placed on record as Annexure

P-2. Annexure P-3 is the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with

151 CPC, filed along with the plaint. Ther

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top