HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUSHIL KUMARI AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM SUNDER AND ORS – Respondent
FAO-5082-2015
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH.
FAO No. 5082 of 2015 (O&M)
Date of Decision: December 19, 2018
Sushil Kumari and others
........APPELLANTS
VERSUS
Shyam Sunder and others
........RESPONDENTS
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present:
Mr. Rajat Garg, Advocate for
Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate
for the appellants.
Ms. Vandana Malhotra, Advocate
for respondent No. 3.
*******
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
CM-15739-CII-2015
Heard on the application for condonation of delay. There is
delay of 278 days in filing the appeal.
As per the applicants, deceased-Jagdish was sole bread earner
of the family. Appellant No. 1-Sushil Kumari (wife of deceased) was
collecting relevant documents required for production in the case. When she
approached her counsel, she came to know that her evidence had been
closed, resulting in dismissal of her claim petition. She was not intimated
immediately by her counsel after dismissal of the claim petition which
resulted in delay of 278 days in filing the appeal.
Keeping in view the above facts, supported by affidavit, delay
of 278 days in filing the ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.