SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAJ KARAN SINGH AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
JAGMOHAN SINGH AND ORS – Respondent


RSA No.696 of 2010

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.696 OF 2010

DATE OF DECISION: FEBRUARY 01, 2012

Raj Karan Singh & another

.... Appellants

Versus

Jagmohan Singh & others

.... Respondents

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL.

* * * *

PRESENT: Mr. Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with

Mr. Chetan Salathia, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. M. L. Sarin, Senior Advocate with

Mr. Kabir Sarin, Advocate for the respondent No.1.

Respondents No.2 to 4 ex parte.

* * * *

L.N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

Plaintiffs-Raj Karan Singh and Sukhdev Singh sons of Ajit Singh

who were successful in the trial Court but have been non-suited by the lower

Appellate Court are in second appeal.

Case of the plaintiffs is that the suit land was mortgaged with

possession by predecessor in interest of the defendants/respondents with Ajit

Singh father and predecessor of the plaintiffs/appellants and the mortgage was

not redeemed within limitation period and therefore, plaintiffs have become

owners of the suit land by eflux of time. In the alternative, the plaintiffs also

claimed to have become owners of the suit land by adverse possession.

Accordi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top