SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SURINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KAUR SINGH – Respondent


R. S. A. No. 1889 of 2011

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Case No. : R. S. A. No. 1889 of 2011

Date of Decision : May 02, 2011

Surinder Singh

....

Appellant

Vs.

Kaur Singh

....

Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL

* * *

Present :

Mr. Hem Raj Kapil, Advocate

for the appellant.

* * *

L. N. MITTAL, J. (Oral) :

Defendant Surinder Singh, who was successful in the trial

court, but has been unsuccessful in the lower appellate court, has filed the

instant second appeal.

Kaur Singh – plaintiff-respondent filed suit against defendant-

appellant for recovery of Rs.6,80,000/- alleging that on 21.04.2002,

defendant borrowed Rs.5,00,000/- from the plaintiff and executed pronote

and receipt for the same and agreed to repay the same with interest @ 1%

per month, but did not repay principal or interest amount. Accordingly, the

plaintiff claimed Rs.5,00,000/- as principal amount along with Rs.1,80,000/-

R. S. A. No. 1889 of 2011

2

as interest amount.

The defendant broadly denied the plaint allegations. He denied

having borrowed Rs.5,00,000/- from the plaintiff or having executed the

impugned pronot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top