SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATISH KUMAR AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. – Respondent
/6852/2018



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

(Proceedings conducted through video conference)

CWP No.6852 of 2018 (O&M)

Date of decision : 13.01.2021

Satish Kumar and others

... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Amit Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. KK Gupta, Advocate

for Haryana School Education Board, Bhiwani.

****

REKHA MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

Counsel for State of Haryana, by referring to the latest status

report dated 18.12.2020 would state that writ petitions were filed by 255

petitioners out of which 249 have been given appointment and in the cases

of six petitioners, there is report with regard to mis-match or absence.

In view of the aforesaid, petition stands disposed of having

rendered infructuous but without prejudice to right of the petitioners to take

recourse to appropriate remedy for grant of consequential benefits, if any.

13.01.2021

ashok

( REKHA MITTAL )

JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: YES/NO

Whether reportable: YES/NO

ASHOK KUMAR

2021.01.15 13:36

I attest to the authenticity and

accuracy of this document

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top