SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SMADH BABA DAULAT GIRI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
JAI KARAN – Respondent


CM-11691-C-2019 in/and

RSA-4186-2019 (O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CM-11691-C-2019 in/and

RSA-4186-2019 (O&M)

Date of decision: 24.09.2019

Smadh Baba Daulat Giri and another

..... Appellants

Versus

Jai Karan

..... Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

Present:-

Mr. SK Garg Narwana, Senior Advocate with

Mr. JS Johal, Advocate for the applicant-appellants.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)

Through this application (CM-11691-C-2019), under Section

151 CPC, prayer has been made for condonation of inordinate delay of

2531 days in re-filing the instant regular second appeal.

The ground taken by applicant-appellants in the application

for condonation of such an inordinate delay is that Ramesh Kumar, Clerk

of their counsel, inadvertently, put the papers of this appeal in paper

book of CWP-15615-2011, titled as “Richh Pal Vs. The Financial

Commissioner Haryana, Chandigarh and others”, decided on 05.09.2012

(Annexure A-1). In the process of weeding out of decided case files after

5 years, on checking brief of every case, the aforesaid mistake of putting

papers in the rack/almirah of decided cases came to the notice of said

clerk. Therefore, i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top