SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
KAMALUDDIN AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SOHRAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


Kamaluddin and others

Appellants

Versus

Sohrab and others

Respondents

Akbar and another

Appellants

Versus

Sohrab and others

Respondents

Date of decision: 28th November, 2013

! "#$$

1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed

to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with

Mr. Chetan Salathia, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 7.

$$%

This judgment shall dispose of two appeals viz. (1) RSA

No.1226 of 2012 titled as 8Kamaluddin and others v. Sohrab and others9

and (2) RSA No.1235 of 2012 titled as 8Akbar and another v. Sohrab

and others9 as similar substantial questions of law have been raised on

similar grounds and facts in both the appeals. However, for brevity, the

facts are being taken from RSA No.1226 of 2012.

Singh Rattan Pal

2013.12.05 17:15

I attest to the acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top