SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAJ RANI AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
HANUMAN JI MANDIR AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

R.S.A. No. 4252 of 2012 (O&M)

Date of decision : April 08, 2015

Raj Rani and others

... Appellants

vs.

Hanuman Ji Mandir/Dera Sh. Hanuman,

Raghumajra, Patiala and others

... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. P.K. Gupta, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate

for the respondent no.1.

Surinder Gupta, J

Respondent no.1-Hanumanji, Mandir/Dera Hanumanji,

Raghomajra, Patiala through its Mohatamim Lal Nath Chela Hardwari Nath

filed suit for possession of land bearing khewat khatauni no.3656/5900,

khasra no.1855 (3-0) situated at Patiala alleging that the suit land is owned

by the plaintiff as per entries in jamabandi for the year 1991-92. Earlier

Sohan Nath being Mohant/Mohatamim/manager of the Dera of Mandir was

cultivating the suit land and after his death, the same was under the

cultivation of Lal Nath, who was performing Pooja and managing the Dera.

Sohan Nath was an illiterate person and khasra girdwari was recorded in

the name of Hari Ram son of Ram Lal in an illegal manner. Hari Ram had

died several years back and the entries in the khasra girdwari cont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top