SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
DALIP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CHAJJU SINGH – Respondent


CR-6393-2019 (O&M)

Page 1 of 4

240

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CR-6393-2019 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 24.02.2023

Dalip Singh

.…Petitioner

Versus

Chajju Singh

….Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:

Mr. Rishav Jain, Advocate &

Mr. Kanish Jindal, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Ms. Manveer Kaur, Advocate

for Mr. J.S. Bhandohel, Advocate

for the respondent.

*****

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

Petition herein is for setting aside order dated 15.02.2019

(Annexure P-5) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division),

Moonak whereby application of petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for

amendment of written statement, was dismissed.

2.

Succinct facts first, as pleaded in the revision petition.

2.1.

Plaintiff/respondent filed a suit for possession of suit land as well

as for permanent injunction against petitioner/defendant. Petitioner/defendant

filed a detailed written statement thereto. However, during pendency of the

suit petitioner/defendant filed an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for

amendment of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top