IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Transfer Application No.367 of 2012 (O&M)

Date of decision: 10.10.2012.

&

Transfer Application No.547 of 2012 (O&M)

Supreet Kaur

...Petitioner

versus

Taranveer Singh

....Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

----

Present:

Mr. K.S. Jetley, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr.Jasmeet Singh Bhatia, Advocate,

for the respondent.

----

1.

Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment ? No.

2.

To be referred to the reporters or not ? No.

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ? No.

----

K.Kannan, J. (Oral)

1.

Both the cases are at the instance of the same parties and

involving the same cause of action. Hence, with the consent of both

counsel, they are taken up together and disposed of.

2.

Both the petitions for transfer are sought in respect of

two matrimonial proceedings, one for divorce and another for

custody of a minor child, both of which have been initiated by the

husband against the wife. The petitioner pleads for indigency as a

Transfer Application No.367 of 2012 (O&M)

- 2 -

principal reason why she cannot go to Ludhiana from Ambala which

is about 100 ki