SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
UMA BHATIA AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY KUMAR AND ANR – Respondent


RSA No. 3487 of 2013

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

RSA No. 3487 of 2013 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 31.01.2019

Uma Bhatia and others

...... Appellants

VERSUS

Vijay Kumar Bhatia and another

..... Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present:

Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate,

for the appellant.

Mr. Amit Prashar, Advocate,

for the respondents.

JAISHREE THAKUR, J.

1.

This is a regular second appeal that has been filed

seeking to challenge the decision of the Courts below whereby their

suit for partition in respect of House No. 446, Sector 21-A, Faridabad,

admitted to be jointly owned by all concerned, has been dismissed on

illegal and invalid grounds.

2.

The plaintiff-appellants herein are legal heirs of late Shri

Jagdish Chand Bhatia, who expired on 17.05.2007. Before his death

late Sh. Jagdish Chand Bhatia was joint owner of property described

as House No. 446, Sector 21-A, Faridabad, along with Vijay Kumar

Bhatia, his brother, and Manju Bhatia wife of R.K. Bhatia, another

SATYAWAN

2019.02.11 17:21

I attest to the accuracy and

i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top