HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
UMA BHATIA AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY KUMAR AND ANR – Respondent
RSA No. 3487 of 2013
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
RSA No. 3487 of 2013 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 31.01.2019
Uma Bhatia and others
...... Appellants
VERSUS
Vijay Kumar Bhatia and another
..... Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Present:
Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate,
for the appellant.
Mr. Amit Prashar, Advocate,
for the respondents.
JAISHREE THAKUR, J.
1.
This is a regular second appeal that has been filed
seeking to challenge the decision of the Courts below whereby their
suit for partition in respect of House No. 446, Sector 21-A, Faridabad,
admitted to be jointly owned by all concerned, has been dismissed on
illegal and invalid grounds.
2.
The plaintiff-appellants herein are legal heirs of late Shri
Jagdish Chand Bhatia, who expired on 17.05.2007. Before his death
late Sh. Jagdish Chand Bhatia was joint owner of property described
as House No. 446, Sector 21-A, Faridabad, along with Vijay Kumar
Bhatia, his brother, and Manju Bhatia wife of R.K. Bhatia, another
SATYAWAN
2019.02.11 17:21
I attest to the accuracy and
i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.