SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUBHASH AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
KASHA RAM AND ORS – Respondent


RSA No.2624 of 2015 (O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

RSA No.2624 of 2015 (O&M)

Date of Decision.02.09.2015

Subhash and others

.......Appellants

Versus

Kesha Ram and others

......Respondents

Present:

Mr. Madan Lal, Advocate

for the appellants.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

-.-

K. KANNAN J. (ORAL)

1.

Delay of 290 days in refiling the appeal condoned.

2.

The suit was filed by a person as purchaser of the property

from the 2nd defendant Shanti. Shanti's brother was Mewa and Mewa's

daughter was Suneeta. The defendants, who are the appellants, are

successors-in-interest of Suneeta. Their contention was that in a decree

obtained by their predecessor Suneeta against Shanti in Civil Suit No.1159

of 1992, the properties were granted to Suneeta. The suit was filed on

the basis that the plaintiffs' own purchase from Shanti was through a

transaction dated 3.11.1988 and at the time of the institution of the suit

in Civil Suit No.1159 of 1992,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top