SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUKHDEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GURNAM KAUR & ORS – Respondent


RSA No.6390 of 2016 (O&M)

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

RSA No.6390 of 2016 (O&M)

Date of decision:09.05.2018

Sukhdev Singh

... Appellant

Vs.

Gurnam Kaur (since deceased ) through LR and others

... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:-

Mr. P.K.S.Phoolka, Advocate

for the appellant.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral)

C.M.No.16776-C of 2016

For the reasons stated in the application which is duly

supported by an affidavit, delay of 60 days in re-filing the appeal is

condoned.

C.M. stands disposed of.

RSA No.6390 of 2016 (O&M)

Appellant-plaintiff is in Regular Second Appeal against the

concurrent findings of facts, whereby, suit claiming declaration by laying

challenge to the transfer deed dated 15.12.2005 executed by defendant

No.1-Gurnam Kaur in favour of defendant No.2-Gurbachan Singh in respect

of land measuring 58 kanals 6 marlas, has been dismissed by the trial Court

and affirmed by the Lower Appellate Court.

Savita

2018.05.15 10:47

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

High Court Chandigarh

RSA No.6390 of 2016 (O&M)

{2}

Mr. P.K.S. Phoolka, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

appellant-p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top