SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
KRISHAN PAL & ORS – Appellant
Versus
AMAR NATH PANDEY – Respondent


RSA No.4235 of 2014 (O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RSA No.4235 of 2014 (O&M)

Date of Decision.23.03.2018

Krishan Pal and others

......Appellants

Vs

Amar Nath Pandey and others

.....Respondents

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

Present:

Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate

for the appellants.

Mr. N.D. Achint, Advocate

for the respondents.

-.-

AMIT RAWAL J.(ORAL)

The appellants-defendant Nos.1 to 3 i.e. Krishan Pal, Kailash

Chand and Rajbir (since deceased) represented through legal heirs, who

were ex parte before the trial Court are in regular second appeal against the

judgment and decree rendered by the lower Appellate Court whereby suit

for specific performance of the agreement to sell dated 26.8.2004 in respect

of their share has been partly decreed by taking out the share of defendant

Nos.4 and 5, who were land owners, for want of permission.

The respondent-plaintiff instituted the suit for specific

performance of the agreement to sell dated 26.8.2004 in respect of the land

measuring 4 kanals as described in para 2 of the plaint (hereinafter called

the “suit property”). It was submitted tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top