HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SARABJIT KAUR – Appellant
Versus
KAMALJIT SINGH – Respondent
RSA 4865 2017
RSA No. 4865 of 2017 (1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No. 4865 of 2017 (O&M)
Date of decision: 22.02.2022
Sarabjit Kaur
… Appellant
versus
Kamaljit Singh
…Respondent
Coram :
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Monga
Present :
Mr. Charanpal Singh Bagri, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. S. D. Sharma, Senior Advocate assisted by
Mr. Anupam Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.
Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate, for PSPCL.
Arun Monga, J.
1.
For convenience, parties herein are described as per recitals
before the trial Court.
2.
Having suffered concurrent adverse findings by the two Courts
below, the defendant is in second appeal before this Court assailing the trial
Court judgment and decree dated 30.09.2016, as upheld by the learned First
Appellate Court vide its judgment and decree dated 08.09.2017.
3.
Briefly stated, succinct facts first, as noticed by Courts below.
Plaintiff Kamaljit Singh purchased 5K-19M of land along with the share in
electric motor connection from its previous owners Rajinder Singh and
Jaswinder Kaur (children of Harbhajan @ Gurbhajan Singh son of Naranjan
Singh) vide registered sale deed No. 686 dated 23.05.2013. Plaintiff pleaded
that he had also purchased another 5K-19M land along with share in the
electric motor connection from one Balwant Singh son of Gurdev Singh vide
registered sale-deed No. 3793 dated 24.01.2014, who had in turn purchased
VARINDER SINGH
2022.03.16 10:28
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document.
Punjab & Haryana High Court at
Chandigarh
RSA No. 4865 of 2017 (2)
the said share from Baljinder Singh son of Harbhajan @ Gurbhajan Singh.
Said Harbhajan Singh @ Gurbhajan Singh had four children, namely,
Rajinder Singh, Jaswinder Kaur, Jasvir Singh and Baljinder Singh.
Accordingly, the plaintiff claimed to be owner in possession of 11K-18M in
the suit property and thus entitled to joint use of electric motor connection
No. 2G-374. However, defendant Sarabjit Kaur wife of Jasvir Singh son of
Harbhajan @ Gurbhajan Singh resisted the claim of usage of electric motor
connection. On the other hand plaintiff claimed that ever since he became
the owner of the respective share of land in the joint holding, he had been
maintaining the said electric motor connection. The motor connection in
question still subsists in the name of ancestor of Rajinder Singh, namely,
Naranjan Singh. He has been using the said connection for irrigation
purposes. The defendant is therefore illegally attempting to obstruct into the
peaceful use and enjoyment over the said electric motor connection. Hence,
the suit for permanent injunction.
4.
In return, the defendant took preliminary objections to the suit
being not maintainable; concealment of true and material facts; estoppel, suit
being filed on frivolous and vexatious grounds; and locus standi. She
contended that the previous owners from whom the plaintiff had purchased
the land had already relinquished their right, title and interest regarding the
electric motor connection bearing account number 2G-374 of 10 HRP in
favour of her husband Jasvir Singh. Grand-father of Jasvir Singh had seven
sons, namely, Harbhajan @ Gurbhajan Singh, Malkit Singh, Jit Singh,
Bakshish Singh, Jora Singh, Parupkar Singh and Jagdish Singh. Jasvir Singh
had transferred his share of land measuring 14K-18M including all the rights
by transfer deed bearing No.02/09/2001 dated 12.10.2009 in her favour.
VARINDER SINGH
2022.03.16 10:28
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document.
Punjab & Haryana High Court at
Chandigarh
RSA No. 4865 of 2017