SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
DINESH MEHTA
MUKESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW/527/2023



[2023/RJJD/002112]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 476/2023

Rajani Yadav W/o Mukesh Kumar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o M.no. 60,

Jilani Mata Road, Kachhari Ke Pass, Behror, District Alwar, (Raj.), At

Present Working On The Post Of Principal, At Govt. Senior Secondary

School, Siryani (216236).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Education

Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2.

Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

3.

Munesh Yadav, Principal At Govt. Senior Secondary School,

Luhakana Kalan (2186323), District Jaipur (Raj.).

----Respondents

with

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 527/2023

Mukesh Kumar S/o Udmiram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o M. No. 60,

Jilani Mata Road, Kachhari Ke Pass, Behror, District Alwar (Raj.), At

Present Working On The Post Of Principal, At Govt. Senior

Secondary School, Shamda (216300), District Alwar (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Education

Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

2.

Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.

3.

Avinash Sharma, Principal At Govt. Senior Secondary School,

Bhamod (218326), District Jaipur (Raj.).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vikram Singh Bhati

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Vishal Jangid

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

24/01/2023

1.

The petitioners being wife and husband in their

respective writ petitions, have challenged the order dated

20.12.2022, whereby they have been transferred from District

Alwar to Bharatpur.

[2023/RJJD/002112]

(2 of 2)

[CW-476/2023]

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that

transfer of the persons against whom the petitioners were

transferred has been cancelled by the State Government and,

therefore, purported administrative exigency to transfer the

petitioners does not continue.

3.

Without interfering in the present writ petitions, the

petitioners are permitted to file a representation before the

competent authority of the State Government highlighting the fact

that transfer order of persons namely Avinash Sharma and

Munesh Yadav, against whom the petitioners were transferred, has

been cancelled.

4.

In case, any representation is so addressed by the

petitioners, the competent authority of the State Government shall

consider the same objectively, particularly in view of the fact that

transfer order of persons namely Avinash Sharma and Munesh

Yadav has been cancelled by the State Government.

5.

The competent authority shall consider the

representation submitted by the petitioners in accordance with

law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two

weeks of receiving the representation.

6.

With the directions aforesaid, both the writ petitions are

disposed of.

Stay applications also stand disposed of.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

302-Mak/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top