HANSMUKH BHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP 296/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 296/2022
Hansmukh Bhai S/o Jinna Bhai Kothia, Aged About 45 Years, R/o
Dahisarda, Undaisaal Tipdiya, Tehsil Paddari, District Rajkot,
Gujrat.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Saurabh Soni
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
09/02/2022
This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 CrPC
has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner being
aggrieved with the order dated 21.10.2021 passed by the
Addl. Sessions Judge, Gulabpura, Distt. Bhilwara (for
short ‘the trial court’), whereby the trial court while
deciding the application under Section 451 and 457 CrPC
has ordered for releasing the scorpio vehicle in question
bearing
registration
No.GJ-03-LB-8820
on
supardaginama subject to the condition that petitioner
will furnish a personal bond of rupees sixteen lakh along
with one surety of like amount verified by the Revenue
Officer by issuing Haisiyat Praman Patra.
(2 of 3)
[CRLMP-296/2022]
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
the condition of furnishing personal bond of rupees
sixteen lakh along with one surety of like amount verified
by the Revenue Officer by issuing Haisiyat Praman Patra
is too harsh. It is further submitted that admittedly the
petitioner is registered owner of the vehicle and was not
involved in commission of crime, in which, the police has
seized the vehicle in question. As a matter of fact, some
smugglers, after stealing the above-referred vehicle from
District Rajkot, Gujarat, has used the same for
transporting narcotic contraband. Learned counsel has
further submitted that even on the day when the vehicle
in question was seized by the police, the cost of the same
was not rupees sixteen lakh. It is also submitted that in
the insurance policy of the year 2019, the total value of
the above-mentioned vehicle was assessed as
Rs.14,43,014/-. It is, thus, prayed by learned counsel for
the petitioner that the condition imposed by the trial
court vide impugned order of furnishing personal bond of
rupees sixteen lakh along with one surety of like amount
verified by the Revenue Officer by issuing Haisiyat
Praman Patra may kindly be modified.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the criminal
misc. petition.
(3 of 3)
[CRLMP-296/2022]
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
after going through the material available on record, I am
of the opinion that the condition imposed by the trial
court of furnishing personal bond of rupees sixteen lakh
along with one surety of like amount verified by the
Revenue Officer by issuing Haisiyat Praman Patra is not
reasonable.
Taking into consideration the overall facts and
circumstances of the case, it is ordered that the scorpio
vehicle in question bearing registration No.GJ-03-LB-
8820 shall be released by the trial court in favour of the
petitioner on supardaginama on furnishing a personal
bond of Rs.10,000/- along with one surety of like
amount.
However, the other conditions mentioned in the
impugned order dated 21.10.2021 passed by the trial
court shall remain intact.
With these observations, this criminal misc. petition
is disposed of.
Stay petition is also disposed of.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
Ms rathore 27
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.