SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
RUMILA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLW/111/2023



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 111/2023

1.

Rumila W/o Shri Mange Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o

Jagasari Chhoti Mundriabara Presently R/o Dhungarana

Bhadra Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

2.

Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 24

Years, R/o Mundariya Bhadra Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary Ministry

Of Home Affairs Jaipur Raj.

2.

The Superintendent Of Police, Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

3.

The S.h.o., Ps Gogamedi Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

4.

Rakesh S/o Shri Om Prakash, R/o Mundariya Bada Dist.

Hanumangarh Raj.

5.

Vikas Kumar S/o Shri Manphool Puniya, R/o Narvasi

6.

Ladu Ram S/o Shri Om Prakash, R/o Mundariya Bada

Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

7.

Tarachand S/o Sheolal, R/o Mundariya Bada Dist.

Hanumangarh Raj.

8.

Jagdish S/o Shri Nandram, R/o Mundariya Bada Dist.

Hanumangarh Raj.

9.

Narendra Kumar S/o Shri Dharmapal, R/o Dungrana

Bhadra Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

10.

Bhoop Singh S/o Momram, R/o Jigasari Chhoti

Hanumangarh Raj.

11.

Mangi Ram S/o Shri Bhoop Singh, R/o Jigasari Chhoti

Hanumangarh Raj.

12.

Ram Singh S/o Shri Jagga Ram, R/o Jigasari Chhoti

Hanumangarh Raj.

13.

Vikram Kumar S/o Shri Om Prakash, R/o Jigasari Chhoti

Hanumangarh Raj.

14.

Jagdish S/o Shri Motaram, R/o Jigasari Chhoti

Hanumangarh Raj.

15.

Kuldeep S/o Shri Jagdish Chandra Sharma, R/o Goyal

Kalla Dist. Panipat Haryana

----Respondents

(2 of 2)

[CRLW-111/2023]

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vinod Kumar Sihag

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. M.S. Bhati, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Order

27/01/2023

The petitioners have preferred this writ petition under Article

226 of Constitution of India for protection of Life and Liberty from

the private respondent(s).

After hearing the counsel for the petitioners and on an

overall consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case,

this Court deems it proper to direct the petitioners to appear

before the Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh, who shall hear

the grievance of the petitioners and if necessitated, provide

adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

Consequently, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Stay petition also disposed of.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

129-Rashi/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top