SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
RUMILA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 111/2023

1.

Rumila W/o Shri Mange Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o

Jagasari Chhoti Mundriabara Presently R/o Dhungarana

Bhadra Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

2.

Sandeep Kumar S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 24

Years, R/o Mundariya Bhadra Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary Ministry

Of Home Affairs Jaipur Raj.

2.

The Superintendent Of Police, Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

3.

The S.h.o., Ps Gogamedi Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

4.

Rakesh S/o Shri Om Prakash, R/o Mundariya Bada Dist.

Hanumangarh Raj.

5.

Vikas Kumar S/o Shri Manphool Puniya, R/o Narvasi

6.

Ladu Ram S/o Shri Om Prakash, R/o Mundariya Bada

Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

7.

Tarachand S/o Sheolal, R/o Mundariya Bada Dist.

Hanumangarh Raj.

8.

Jagdish S/o Shri Nandram, R/o Mundariya Bada Dist.

Hanumangarh Raj.

9.

Narendra Kumar S/o Shri Dharmapal, R/o Dungrana

Bhadra Dist. Hanumangarh Raj.

10.

Bhoop Singh S/o Momram, R/o Jigasari Chhoti

Hanumangarh Raj.

11.

Mangi Ram S/o Shri Bhoop Singh, R/o Jigasari Chhoti

Hanumangarh Raj.

12.

Ram Singh S/o Shri J

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top